Keystone XL's Climate Impact Worse Than Thought: Study

The climate impacts of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline could be worse than thought, a new analysis shows.

According to the study published Sunday in the journal Nature Climate Change, completing this fossil fuel infrastructure project, which would run from Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Nebraska, could lead to increased oil production. That in turn will cause a decrease in global oil prices, leading to greater oil consumption, the analysis states.

"We find that for every barrel of increased production, global oil consumption would increase 0.6 barrels owing to the incremental decrease in global oil prices," the study states.

“If that’s the case, that’d be a big greenhouse-gas impact,” stated co-author Peter Erickson, a senior scientist at the Stockholm Environment Institute in Seattle, Washington.

Read more

Donate Volunteer Join

Connect with Us

Links

Latest California News

Officials in Oakland, California, effectively ended proposals to open a new coal export terminal by voting to ban the transport and storage of the fossil...

Oil corporations have intensified their push to make the San Francisco Bay Area and other areas of the West Coast into international hubs for refining...

In a major victory for solar power companies and their customers, California regulators voted to preserve an incentive program that has fueled the dramatic growth...

It was widely reported last week that the public relations and lobbying blitz funded by the major oil companies succeeded in toppling one of Jerry...

As Western wildfires follow the worst drought in modern history, the impacts of global warming have never been more stark. And as electric cars, LED...